Pound kill rate sparks concern

Melbourne Age;Mark Russell ; May 1 2011

A LOST Dogs Home plan to take over the running of more council pounds has alarmed animal welfare groups, who say the strategy will lead to more dogs and cats being killed.

The home has won three council contracts from rival RSPCA Victoria and has plans to take over more pounds as well as expand interstate.

The home has won contracts with Casey, Hobsons Bay and Echuca councils by tender from the RSPCA over the past two years and now runs 17 council pounds in Victoria.

But animal welfare groups have criticised the home’s growth strategy because of its high kill rate of impounded animals.

Activist Mike Bailey, who runs the Stop the Clock campaign aimed at preventing impounded dogs and cats from being routinely killed after 28 days, asked why the Lost Dogs Home was bidding for more council contracts when it knew it could not find homes for the thousands of animals it already had.

The home killed 85.8 per cent (10,352) of the 12072 cats and 26.2 per cent (3242) of the 12,354 dogs it received at its main shelters at North Melbourne and Cranbourne in 2009-10.

RSPCA Victoria, which still runs 17 council pounds, had a much lower kill rate, putting down 56.4 per cent (9086) of the 16,111 cats it received and 18.6 per cent (3297) of the 17,733 dogs it received in 2009-10. RSPCA Victoria’s chief executive, Maria Mercurio, admitted the organisation was losing contracts to the home.

She said her organisation accepted that its bids to run council pounds may not have been cheap enough but the group’s aim was to save animals.

”We are committed to … implementing preventative measures to reduce the number of animals ultimately coming into shelters, and these programs are not reliant on being awarded pound contracts,” she said.

City of Casey spokesman Chris Ryan said tenders were called for all contracts valued at more than $150,000. The Lost Dogs Home was awarded the council’s pound contract, held by the RSPCA for the past 15 years, in December and will begin services on June 1.

The Lost Dogs Home’s Graeme Smith said the organisation did not receive any government funding, unlike the RSPCA. ”Tenders are judged on many factors. These include financial, ability to deliver, customer service, management, quality, etc,” Mr Smith said.

”In other words, they are awarded on the basis of performance.”

Mr Smith said he welcomed plans announced by the Baillieu government to remove the 28-day time limit for keeping animals in shelters before they had to be put down. ”It will allow us to do more for the dogs that have behavioural problems,” he said.

”These changes … will see a further reduction in our euthanasia rate for dogs.”

Councils that do not run in-house animal pounds agree to pay a set fee to a shelter for the cost of caring for each animal brought in. By law, animals must be kept for eight days to give the shelter time to find the owner. Any expenses after eight days, when the animal may be placed into adoption or rehabilitation, are incurred by the shelter. This includes desexing, microchipping, food and medical costs.

Ms Mercurio said a big challenge for animal welfare groups was the state’s soaring cat population.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/pound-kill-rate-sparks-concern-20110430-1e29v.html#ixzz1LT1bTHPi

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/pound-kill-rate-sparks-concern-20110430-1e29v.html#ixzz1LT1G08oy

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under RSPCA victoria, Victoria

2 responses to “Pound kill rate sparks concern

  1. companionanimalnews

    There is no way that a Charity Shelter should be allowed to take on more Council contracts if it has a hi kill rate and poor rehoming rate. Also the pubic needs to know how much “profit” gets fed back to the home base. Why would they do this if it wasn’t for a financial motive? Is there legislation to ensure that the entirety of the Council contract monies are spent on that facility? If not, why not? Ask the questions people!

  2. The tender process needs to be changed and to be more inclusive to performance based ie non kill. This is an utter disgrace that they are allowed shelters to win contracts when it is obviously not providing the service and care that the public expect from their councils. There should be a performance based clause that if you kill more that 10% of your intake of animals then you should not be allowed to take on more contracts. They are encouraging killing instead of rehoming. To be killing up to 85% should have been picked up in the tender process and these groups should no longer be allowed to be killing houses for the councils.
    Shameful treatment of our pets by the very people we pay to provide us with a service. Your pets flogged off to the killing homes as out of sight out of mind. and shame on their members for allowing something as horrendous as this to continue without vetting. Be vocal and say this is not the behaviour we expect from our Council.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s