Puppy farm cruelty outrage

The Mercury, CRAIG HOGGETT   |   January 11, 2012

HUNDREDS of dogs are being used as breeding machines in squalid conditions at puppy farms around Tasmania, it was claimed yesterday.

Brightside Sanctuary says it has taken possession of 120 former breeding dogs in the past year, including 55 seized from one intensive farming operation.

The revelation is the second in a week about widespread animal cruelty going unchecked across the state.

The Sunday Tasmanian this week revealed that dog fighting rings are under investigation by the RSPCA and police.

The issue has prompted governments in other states to tighten regulation of the breeding industry.

Sanctuary owner Emma Haswell says that the dogs are often forced to live in their own filth in dark dirty sheds.

When brought to her sanctuary, ex-breeding dogs can have conditions ranging from demodectic mange which causes hair loss to severe eye and ear infections or hernias resulting from multiple caesarean sections.

“I think part of the problem is the public don’t know what a puppy farm is or that they are actually buying from a puppy farm,” Ms Haswell said.

“A large part of the problem is that the Animal Welfare Act doesn’t stipulate what you can and can’t do well enough.”

Ms Haswell has worked with animal control officers from various councils to seize dogs that are being mistreated.

She says she knows of about seven farms operating but believes there are many more.

“I know that they [puppy farms] are in every state in Australia and Tasmania has a fair share,” she said. “Everyone thought there were no puppy farms, but when you start looking around there are plenty.”

However, she says that after the animals are saved, no charges are being brought against operators.

A review of animal welfare legislation is happening now in Tasmania.

Dogs’ Homes of Tasmania president John Gray said his organisation was aware of the large-scale operations but could not name them because of a lack of evidence.

“The thing that needs to happen is spot checks to catch them in the act,” Mr Gray said.

He said that a key change needed to be an enforceable registration system for breeders.

“That would make it a lot easier. As soon as someone puts an advert in the paper or online and there’s no licence number, I’d personally be on the phone very quickly,” Mr Gray said.

“If you are not registered you should have to put up with the full force of the law.”

He said that without licences it was very difficult to distinguish between legitimate breeders and people potentially mistreating animals.

He described the current review as long overdue and said the issue needed to be dealt with faster.

“In the eight-or-so months the review of legislation goes for, how many puppies will have ended up in not-very-nice conditions?” Mr Gray said. “We don’t seem to be getting the message across to the politicians or to the courts.

“People that do go to court over animal cruelty so often just get a slap on the wrist.”

A government spokesman said the Animal Welfare Advisory Committee was due to report to Deputy Premier Bryan Green by mid-2012 after spending October to December deciding on a proper consultation process.


Original here..


1 Comment

Filed under RSPCA Tasmania, Tasmania

One response to “Puppy farm cruelty outrage

  1. Geoff Birkbeck

    Interesting comment:

    “Dogs’ Homes of Tasmania president John Gray said his organisation was aware of the large-scale operations but could not name them because of a lack of evidence.”

    Maybe because there are laws in relation to liblious and slanderous comments based on heresay.

    No persons willing to make a formal statement Mr Gray? Did one of your volunteers hear this and tell you Mr Gray? Needed to make a comment to see your name in the paper again Mr Gray?

    Evidence gathering is a simple process. You take photos, You have another person with you to act as a collaborator (make sure its not an animal activist pursuing her own modelling career) You make a formal statement. You find people that are willing to put this in writing based on facts not emotions. You check with local council on the zoning for the property. You do not break the law in obtaining it by having a film crew when you break into the premisis then using the footage for your own advantage. You collect and collate any advertising material from the offenders. You do not use Facebook or any other social medium before it is reported to give the aledged offender time to prepare a defence or destory evidence. You report it to every government department you can think of. You bring the matter up at a council meeting or go to your local elected member. You seek legal advice.

    ……..and if no action is being taken by the authorities, then, and only then you go to the media with the FACTS not HEARSAY, Mr Gray

    Once this is all done and the community has been made aware and fully informed of the whole matter, Mr Gray, you can make a factual statement in the press this time Mr Gray

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s