Category Archives: NSW


Published 3 hours agoThe RSPCA NSW is the leading charity pound provider in the country.

They take in more animals than any other animal welfare organisation – 33,000 dogs and cats every year*

They also generate easily the most revenue of any animal charity in the country, with Australian’s gifting more than $51 million dollars to the organisation in the 2014-15 year**. The state government even donated $7.5 million dollars to the organisation for new facilities back in 2012. As such they should be a beacon of excellence for our animal welfare dollar spend.

We made them rich because we love our pets.

In return, we expected that they will be providing what should be some of the very best examples of animal sheltering in the world. These guys should be leading the charge in compassionate, cutting-edge, dedicated care for pets – that is the community expectation.

So this graph compares the RSPCA NSW’s performance with other RSPCA shelters nationally.

For every ten dogs and cats brought into their shelters, the RSPCA NSW kills four times as many as the RSPCA QLD and twice as many at the RSPCA VIC.

Which doesn’t seem like “cutting-edge” at all, but terrible, terrible underperformance in comparison to their peers.

But that’s not all.

When we look at WHY dogs are being killed we see an even larger difference between the agencies:

For some reason, the dogs in NSW are being killed at a rate twice or three times as often for behaviour. And twice as often for medical issues.

The dogs in NSW have a problem.

So, when I first put these graphs out, I was met with hurdled abuse:

“You don’t know how overworked RSPCA staff are – we have literally pets coming out our ears and we all are working ourselves to death here.”


“How very dare you. If it wasn’t for irresponsible owners dumping thousands of pets every week into our shelters they wouldn’t be needed. Why don’t YOU come and take all the pets?”

And you know what? These do seem like pretty reasonable retorts to anyone criticising an animal organsation with such large demands on their shoulders. Certainly I can’t personally put 33,000 animals in my backyard. No one can. So we should all just accept that the staff at the RSPCA NSW work as hard as they can and they’re simply overworked and have to kill pets. Right?

Well, that’s not the entire story. The reality is there is no single RSPCA NSW shelter who is trying to cope with 33,000 pets. In fact there are 10 shelters in the RSPCA family:

  • Blue Mountains
  • Broken Hill
  • Central Coast
  • Coffs Harbour
  • Hunter
  • Illawarra
  • Orange
  • Port Macquarie
  • Shoalhaven and,
  • Sydney

Of these, five of these take less than 1,000 dogs a year (Blue Mountains, Broken Hill, Central Coast, Coffs Harbour and Port Macquarie) and their results are below.

At these small shelters, 3 of the 5 are killing MORE dogs than they’re adopting.

Just think about that for a moment.

More dogs lose their lives in these shelters, than are adopted into new homes. Even though the load is extremely light on the individual shelters and staff could hardly be described as being “swamped” at these places. And this is happening under the management of what is supposedly our leading national animal welfare organisation.

Add to that, exactly zero of these shelters are managing one adoption a day. A DAY. Not one of these shelters gets a successful adoption out the front door every day.

“You don’t know how overworked RSPCA staff are – we have literally pets coming out our ears and we all are working ourselves to death here.”

But they’re just the little ones. What about the big ones?

Fair enough. These shelters combined, take in less than 6,000 pets (2,944 dogs/2,695 cats) – maybe they’re the exception. What about the BIG GUYS? Those who take in more than 1,000 dogs a year (Hunter, Illawarra, Orange, Shoalhaven and Sydney).

THEY must be run ragged, no?


So of these five RSPCA NSW shelters – again three are killing more dogs than they are adopting.

  • Hunter – there is only one way to describe the level of killing here – a fucktonne.
  • Illawarra is killing two and a half time more dogs, than it is adopting.
  • While Orange is basically not even showing up to work. Except to shovel dead dogs into an incinerator.


In addition, if we assume that there are 350 working days a year for a regular run-of-the mill shelter (open weekends most public holidays)

  • Hunter does about one dog adoption a day (but kills nearly three dogs a day)
  • Sydney adopts (a smidge over) 2 dogs a day
  • Illawarra does a dog adoption every other day (but kills more than two dogs daily)
  • Orange adopts a couple of dogs a week (but kills more than one dog daily) and,
  • The only shelter who can claim any success at all – Shoalhaven – adopts one dog a day.

Does any of that feel like staff are being “overworked” to you? Would showing up and doing your job once a day – would that leave you personally gasping for respite?

“How very dare you… Why don’t YOU come and take all the pets?”

That is a very good question, and bloody hell we should.

Someone – anyone – could do better than this. Even if they’d never seen a dog and couldn’t identify the front end from the ass end of an animal. Even if they had a chronic animal allergy and had to work in a hazmat suit. Even then, any one of us could do a better freaking job than this.

In fact, here is the CEO explaining the organisation’s performance (please watch).

Steve says they only kill 2%. WHERE is any of this reflecting 2%?

It’s got me completely befuddled as to how anyone can look at these stats coming out of this organisation and go “yup – seems we’re about 98% effective here – job well done!” Either Steve C. can’t count, or he’s hoping no one would notice.


Steve Coleman has been leading the organsation since 2007. He is obviously not up to the job of leading his shelters into the safe future we require.

You need to fix this.

If you’re in NSW, you should be shouting at your screen about now. Because you PAID for this. You gave this organisation $55 million dollars last year alone and paid to build the swanky head office where the management sit and rubber stamp the operation of their shelters.

If you’re in any of the locations where an RSPCA NSW shelter is delivering these craptastic outcomes, YOU are responsible for lobbying everyone who will listen to make positive change. The animals need an advocate right now.

Go. Do. Fix. YOU.

Original :


– – – – –



*RSPCA Australia National Statistics 2014-15

** RSPCA NSW Financial Statement 2014-15



Leave a comment


NSW strata title law reform proposal means optimistic news for pets…..

Strata Title Law Reform;  Strata & Community Title; Law Reform Position Paper Nov 2013

 Extract from position paper

“4.7       Amend the current residential model by-laws to allow pet ownership with permission, which can not unreasonably be refused and also provide that certain small pets can be kept without permission.

The current model by-laws include three options for regulating pet ownership in schemes. One of these options is to impose a total ban on pet ownership.

It is proposed to replace the current options with a single by-law that will allow certain pets (that is, cats, small dogs, birds and fish) to be kept without permission and all other pets with permission, which cannot unreasonably be refused. Reasonable grounds for an owners corporation to refuse permission might include that the pet is likely to impact other lot owners’ use or enjoyment of their lot or the common property.

There was a strong view in the submissions that pet ownership was unreasonably restricted in many strata schemes. This is a particular problem for pet owners looking to buy or rent a unit. It is thought that by changing the model by-laws, more and more schemes will allow pets to be kept over time.

It is important to note that schemes will still be able to ban pets or certain types of pets if they wish to do so.”

Full position paper available here:

Leave a comment

Filed under Animals in housing, NSW

Rutherford RSPCA kills family’s dogs

Newcastle Herald ,  By JANEK SPEIGHT Sept. 18, 2013

NSW RSPCA is at the centre of another storm regarding its Rutherford shelter’s kill policy after two healthy dogs were put down this week.

Two Jack Russell terriers, Nikki, 1, and Rocket, 2, were euthanised despite owner Kylie McCrea negotiating to get them home.

A fee of almost $1000 was blocking the dogs’ release. Despite not failing any health or temperament tests, a supervisor deemed the dogs a ‘‘nuisance’’ and ordered them destroyed.

It follows a similar incident last year when Max the pointer was put down at Rutherford after failing a controversial temperament test. READ MORE HERE


Filed under Council Pounds, NSW, RSPCA NSW

Poll finds most would pay higher rates to save abandoned animals

Blacktown Sun, Thursday 1 August 2013, Nick Soon

AN overwhelming 98 per cent of some 2500 people have said they would pay an extra $5 in their council rates for their pound to stop killing pets, says a national online poll.

The poll was conducted by Sydney animal rescue group, Pound Rounds Inc, for about three weeks and ended last Friday, July 19.

The question asked was: ‘‘Would you be happy to pay your council an extra $5 per year, per household, to turn your pound into a No Kill one for your community pets?’’. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under NSW, Uncategorized

Kill rates discrepancy

Maitland Mercury; SAM NORRIS; July 16

The extent of the number of dogs and cats destroyed at the RSPCA Rutherford facility is under reported, according to the Society of Companion Animal Rescuers.

RSPCA has reported a 21 per cent kill rate but SOCARES has collected data from the four councils that use the facility, including Maitland, that claims the kill rate is 43.8 per cent.

SOCARES’ investigations point to 227 cats and dogs from the Maitland area that were destroyed in the 2011-12 period.

Of the 671 pets seized, that equates to a kill rate of 33.8 per cent. READ MORE HERE

1 Comment

Filed under NSW, RSPCA NSW

Pound kill rate angers animal advocate

The Advertiser, July 3, 2013

Almost half the dogs and cats from the Cessnock local government area impounded at the RSPCA’s Rutherford facility in the past 12 months were euthanised.

A report to Cessnock City Council’s June 19 meeting said 152 of 490 dogs and 239 of 311 cats from its area were euthanised at the Rutherford pound in the 2012-13 financial year to date – an overall kill rate of 49 per cent.

Society of Companion Animal Rescuers (SoCares) vice-president and Greens candidate for Hunter, David Atwell labelled the RSPCA’s performance “extremely poor” and said council’s kill rate had been better at the old Kurri animal shelter.

Cessnock City Council closed the Kurri pound in August 2011 when it entered into an agreement with the RSPCA to provide pound facilities for the Cessnock local government area.

Under the Companion Animals Act, all council impounding authorities are required to seek alternative placement for companion animals before they are killed. READ MORE HERE

Leave a comment

Filed under Abandoned animals, NSW, RSPCA NSW

Kill rate at pounds hits alarming high

Newcastle Herald ; DAMON CRONSHAW; June 18, 2013

HALF the dogs and cats handed in to the  RSPCA’s Rutherford pound are killed, figures for the Cessnock local government area show.

Cessnock City Council released the figures following calls from animal welfare groups to make them public.

Councillors will consider the matter at a meeting on Wednesday night.

The RSPCA does not release statistics for its Rutherford shelter, which manages the pounds of Lake Macquarie, Newcastle, Cessnock and Maitland councils.

But Society of Companion Animal Rescuers vice-president David Atwell said the Cessnock data would be a good indication of the pound’s overall euthanasia rate.

A Cessnock council report said 152 of 490 dogs and 239 of 311 cats from its area were euthanised at the Rutherford pound in the 2012-13 financial year to date. READ MORE HERE


Filed under NSW, RSPCA NSW